15/11/09 3:16
Publishing Apple changed the music and the cellphone industry. Can they do the same with publishing?
by Josep M. Ganyet
The digitizing of the information changes the rules to everything. Production, storage and distribution costs tend to zero, consumers become also producers and as a result new industries appear that render well established ones obsolete in no time.
One example is the traditional publishing industry with a business model partly based on advertising and partly on subscription, a model that’s sustainable when trucks distribute tons of paper but obsolete when the net distributes terabytes of data.
On such an environment, advertisers flee to a much more interactive and responsive medium, namely the web, and subscriptions are no match for the free high quality content available online.
Who would still post an ad to a local newspaper when you have Craigslist.org or eBay.com? Or, who would pay for gadget reviews on the NYT when you have Engadget.com?
The result: many magazines and newspapers have closed their physical editions and have gone online if not closed at all.
Although Rupert Murdoch is trying to reverse this trend by charging for online access, I think the point is made.
With all this in mind the efforts to bring ebook readers to the market by companies such as Amazon (Kindle), Barnes&Noble (Nook) an Sony (Reader), just to mention a few, make perfect sense in a time of publishing crisis (crisis meaning change, not doom).
Even the endless rumors about Apple developing the mother-of-all-tablet-or-ebook-readers make more sense than ever (this is a bold statement talking about a company that has embedded rumors in their marketing DNA).
Can Apple do the same as they did in the music and the cellphone industries? Via cultofmac.com I stumble on a presentation by Freek Bijl, a Dutch internet strategist, that has put together a simple and yet enlightening presentation about the subject.
Bijl’s states that if Apple is to reinvent the publishing business they need to cover three basic needs:
- Distribution of content
- Business model where publishers can charge for content
- Usability so people can use the reading device as a newspaper or a book
So far, Apple has turned iTunes into an excellent platform for music and application distribution, it has a solid rock business model for both and the iPod and the iPhone have the best interfaces of their kind.
I can’t think of any reason why they wouldn’t want to extend this model to the publishing industry with content distribution via iTunes, micro-payments as in the iPhone App Store and a reading device that matches the iPod and iPhone usability standards.
I’m sure that the whole publishing industry (and that includes Murdoch) are eager to hear Steve Jobs’ next “one more thing”. Even more than the rest of us.
Here’s Freek Bilj’s presentation:
Please leave your comment if you are not a spambot. Trackback URL: Apple changed the music and the cellphone industry. Can they do the same with publishing?.

6 comments on "Apple changed the music and the cellphone industry. Can they do the same with publishing?"
16/11/09
xavier
Long rant.
I hate iTunes and I hate the arrogance behind the idea of iTunes. In my book, it is as bad as sending email attachments in Microsoft Office formats, IE-only sites or having to find and download a codec to view a video. I hate having to install software to access info. I hate Apple ignoring Linux. I get pissed off when I want to listen to a podcast and I end up in a page that is telling me that I iTunes is not installed in my computer.
I don’t get why rumors about Apple are cheerfully received, while rumors from other vendors are FUD or vapourware.
I don’t get why imagining having Apple’s store in a dominant position in the publishing industry is seen as an exciting idea.
Sigh… This is one of those days when I wish that Apple would sponsor Real Madrid, just to bring some sensible people closer to reality…
16/11/09
Josep M. Ganyet
I don’t think Apple deserves all the credit for the transforming of the music and cellphone industries but to me it’s quite clear that they’re the only ones to provide real solutions instead of spending milions in court.
Real solutions in terms of catalog, interface and devices. Not Apple’s fault if noone does it as easy as they do while making money.
Apple is just an a success story. Too bad it’s the only one so far.
16/11/09
xavier
Apple and, hopefully, others, are going to be tempting us with prettry toys to satisfy our e-ink needs and wants. My guess is that most players will want to push closed e-ink devices tighly integrated with closed subscription services, a la ipod-itunes. And that is scary. I don’t want my gadget vendor to have a say in what I read. Call me paranoid.
In 2005, Apple removed from their stores all the books from John Wiley and Sons because they had published a book about Jobs that he did not like.
16/11/09
Josep M. Ganyet
Good point except for that noone controls any of the 60Gb of music in my iPod with just a few albums purchaded from iTunes.
Let Apple (or Amazon or Sony) give us something really usable to read the newspaper at breakfast and the community will do the rest à la iPhone + dev team.
I’m already paying subscription to La Vanguardia. I don’t mind paying Apple if they give me a good experience for the same contents on e-ink.
01/12/09
Albert
Ganyet, m’agradaria poder-te fer unes preguntes per a un treball que estic fent i voldria saber si podries contestar-les i quina via hauria d’utilitzar. He buscat el teu correu però no hi ha hagut sort. T’estic seguint al Twitter.
Gràcies.
18/03/10
Barton Moerman
Indeed a great topic to read and learn about too. Thanks bud
Leave a Reply