We’ve been talking for years about media convergence since first Nicholas Negroponte coined the term and, we’ve grown accustomed to it on the web the hypermedia where all the rest converge.

As I often ask my students, I you didn’t knew the language in a website, would you be able to tell apart a newspaper, a radio station and a TV station only by watching at their websites?

You probably wouldn’t. Each medium trespasses its own traditional boundaries adding content formats from the others:

• Radio websites feature of course audio but are mainly made up of text and images
• TV station websites feature video but also text and audio
• Newspapers website are oftentimes mere translations of the printed medium but they add a layer of rich-media in audio and video

Traditional media on the web become hypermedia and are the medium of choice for the ever growing web generation. I don’t think this generation will settle, either on a desktop or on a mobile device, for a mere digital copy of a physical medium such a newspaper.

The reasoning is quite simple and it goes as follows:

I don’t read newspapers. So, why would I want a digital copy of a newspaper?

But what if I could experience the quality contents of a magazine/radio/TV the way I’m used to, meaning rich-media, interactive, personalized, social and real-time? Would I care if I’m browsing a magazine a radio station or a TV station? Probably not as long as I get what I want, where I want it and the way I want it, which is coincidentally what the iPad promises us.

The forthcoming Apple tablet brings us a little step closer to full media convergence, not that there’s anything especially new you can’t do right now with a browser and decent internet connection, but the new apps (or rather the new content and interaction design), the physical proximity, the multi-touch interface and the position sensor make the sensorial experience somehow different to anything we’ve seen so far.

Check also the Sports Illustrated demo and ask yourself if this is just a magazine or finally a true interactive TV.

Link: The Wired Tablet App: A Video Demonstration | Epicenter | Wired.com

Related posts:

• Web killed the video star. Interactive videoclip by The Arcade Fire If you know me or followed this blog, you know...
• Clive Thompson on How Twitter Creates a Social Sixth Sense If you are skeptical about Twitter, like I was...
• Apple changed the music and the cellphone industry. Can they do the same with publishing? The digitizing of the information changes the rules to everything....

Escaping the Christmas shopping frenzy in Barcelona I stopped at the RAS bookstore/gallery. The truth is that it doesn’t have to be Christmas to spend a lot of money on expensive design books there. But not this time. I just dropped by to wish my friends there a Merry Christmas with the resolute mind of not buying any design book.

To my surprise I found a copy of “Emotional Design, Why We Love or Hate Everyday Things” by usability guru Donald Norman. On the cover a picture of Philippe Starck’s much acclaimed lemon squeezer. I couldn’t help buying it.

In his new book Norman adds emotion to usability, being his thesis that attracting objects actually work better. Don’t think so? Think of how your car seems to run faster when you just washed it or how wine tastes better in designer cups.

This also seems to be true in the case of the ubiquous iPod. Apparently, it is not the best mp3 player in the world (some competitors toss in radio and voice recording for half the price) but it has 80% of the market. Nobody can deny it’s a well crafted piece of technology but the sexyness of its design is its top selling quality, and we expect to get some by owning it and showing our white earbuds in the metro.

We definitely establish emotional links with objects around us and we hope they help us to establish emotional links with people around us (this would be another thesis though).

To me, the cover of the book is not the best example of good design nor are Philippe Starck’s designs but in spite of that I bought the book anyway. I probably wouldn’t have bought it if I were to judge by the cover and didn’t know about Norman and his works, but knowing him, design was of little importance.



Does Norman’s thesis hold true for the book itself?

As for Philippe Starck’s website use it at your own risk. Poor design, it still uses frames, and full screen navigation! I couldn’t get the URL for the lemon squeezer on the cover of the book. This should tell you something about design.

Buy this book at Amazon Emotional Design by Donald Norman

Related posts:

• design that came from the cold Designer and DJ Juha Fiilin brings Finnish design and international...
• The 10 Commandments of Web Design (with hall of shame) Business Week, with the help of Don Norman, John Maeda,...
• www.inocuodesign.com Innovative art and design from Barcelona. Here’s the secret recipe...